Just how true is male superiority? For centuries society has had this belief driven into their minds. The male gender was considered to be stronger and of more capable. Women would be ranked second and never given the chance to prove their potential. It really breaks and disappoints me to know that men of the times before had women degraded to such a level.
However, as we move into the modern times, people learnt about rights. Women were given rights to stand for themselves and not take any nonsense from the opposite gender. It was the right thing to do, to ensure that women don't get mistreated. Since then women worked hard to show that men and women are of equality.
But just how far can it be proved? Because from what I'm actually seeing now is that men tend to excel in certain things where women may find it hard to do. I'm not about to condemn my own gender. I'm just about to discuss what I have observed and noted down.
Firstly, most men would say that women are fickle-minded and indecisive and that it would impair their judgement. Well I don't understand why women are generalised to be fickle and indecisive. I mean aren't we all born as the same species with common bodily organs except for those few that draws a distinctive line between males and females but still we have most of what the opposite gender has. So why say women tend to be more fickle? What special part they have that men don't that contributes to them being fickle? I don't see no logic behind it.
But then you say, women now ARE actually being fickle and indecisive. I would say that the reason we, women act that way because of what was claimed long, long ago. That we are fickle. We get told so often that women are that way that it's driven into our minds thus promoting fickleness and indecisiveness in us. It's all psychological.
Anyway, I think I'm on the brink of being irrelevant to the subject that's supposed to be discussed. What I want to say is that certain things, women can't do better than men. It's not that women CAN'T do it, they can, but less well than men.
Like what you ask? Hmm ... let's see. I've been told by a friend that women can't make good music. And I agree. You don't think so? Well maybe it's just me then but I find songs done by male singers/band more filled with emotion and meaning. I don't know but I used to think I think that way because I prefer hearing a male voice but then when my friend told me that, I realised that it is true. Female singers/bands don't measure up to the opposite gender. Well of course there are excellent female singers especially the older seasoned ones but generally, women suck at music making.
Next, female talkers. As in like seminars and talks. I always find that male talkers spark more attention from the audience. They know how to make it more interesting. But like I said, it's not that women can't give talks, they can, fairly well but just not as good. Also, males tend to have better control of the crowd. It's like they possess this sorta gift that enables them to draw attention better without doing anything. Again, good female talkers do exist but not that easily sought.
There we have two examples in certain areas in which males triumph over females. I am a female myself but I'm not one to turn all feminist at the very moment when men talk about how males are better at certain areas. Because it is true, from my very own observations. But males don't get all chauvinistic now. You have your flaws as well.